Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.


how to reduce emf in your home

In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.

While it sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.

But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In  how to reduce emf , psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for  how to reduce emf  with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.